Article Start
Women who took vitamin D and calcium supplements developed breast cancer at the same rate as those who did not take the supplements, according to astudy by theWomen's Health Initiative that is published in the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, theBoston Globe reports. According to the Globe, the findings "contradic[t] conclusions from previous studies that hinted at benefits from vitamin D." The authors -- led by Rowan Chlebowski of theUniversity of California-Los Angeles -- wrote, "The main findings do not support a causal relationship between calcium and vitamin D supplement use and reduced breast cancer incidence, despite the association observed in some epidemiological studies," adding, "Current evidence does not support their use in any dose to reduce breast cancer risk" (Cooney, Boston Globe, 11/12).

For the study, the researchers tracked 36,282 postmenopausal women for an average of seven years. Each participant received a combined pill of 1,000 milligrams of calcium and 400 international units of vitamin D. Over the course of the study, 528 of the 18,176 women -- or 2.9% -- who received the combined pill developed invasive breast cancer, compared with 546 of the 18,106 women -- or 3% -- who received a placebo (Kaplan,Los Angeles Times, 11/12). According to the Globe, the difference between the groups is not considered statistically significant.

Jennifer Ligibel, a medical oncologist at theDana-Farber Cancer Institute who was not involved in the study, said that the new research is the first rigorous test of vitamin D supplementation that accounts for factors that were not captured in earlier, observational studies. For example, she said that women who take dietary supplements might be healthier to begin with than those who do not, which could have influenced the previous studies. Ligibel added, "I think this is an important study. It tells us there is absolutely more work that needs to be done on vitamin D. I do think the study should put a little bit of brakes on people telling people to take huge doses of vitamin D to prevent cancer."

In aneditorial also published in the journal, Corey Speers and Powel Brown ofBaylor College of Medicine wrote that further research should be done to determine whether the age of the women, the dose of vitamin D they were taking, the calcium they took with it and hormone therapy might have confounded the results (Boston Globe, 11/12).

Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women's Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women's Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women %26 Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.

%26copy; 2008 The Advisory Board Company. All rights reserved. Article End